Contact

Christine Metz Howard
School of Music
785-864-9742

Fan editors are artists, not disgruntled fans, KU scholar argues

Thu, 11/06/2014

LAWRENCE— When discussing the merits of film fan edits, the conversation needs to move beyond Jar Jar Binks, a University of Kansas scholar says.

A bumbling creature from the planet Naboo, Jar Jar Binks was symbolic of the flaws critics and diehard fans saw in the 1999 release of George Lucas’ “Stars Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace.”

A year after the film’s release, California film editor Mike J. Nichols re-edited the movie, removing many of Jar Jar Binks’ antics and scenes that did little to advance the plot. The result, known as “The Phantom Edit,” brought the concept of fan editing into the mainstream and largely framed how critics and audiences viewed the practice.

Joshua Wille, a doctoral student in film and media studies at KU, believes “The Phantom Edit” has been wrongly characterized as a reactionary work by a disgruntled fan. For Wille, “The Phantom Edit” and the hundreds of other fan edits that followed are part of a creative process reshaping how audiences view the production of films.

“The really fascinating thing about fan edits is how creative they are, and that is underrepresented in previous scholarship,” Wille said.

Appearing in the journal Transformative Works and Cultures, Wille’s essay, “Fan Edits and the Legacy of ‘The Phantom Edit,’” is one of the first in-depth looks at the influence of fan editing.

“The Phantom Edit” was not the first fan edit, but it is the best-known. Essentially, fan edits are feature-length alternative versions of films created by fans using desktop video editing software. The alternative version is intended to complement, not replace, the original work.

“It’s an interesting form of film making that is caught between debates of intellectual property, copyright laws and how to distribute content online,” Wille said.

Improvements to video editing software, use of digital video formats, increased computer storage capacity and emergence of fan editing websites have contributed to the growth of fan edits in the past 15 years.

While some fan edits such as “The Phantom Edit” aim to improve the film, others are intended to cast the film in a new genre or to create a version that is closer to the director’s original vision.

Examples of contemporary fan edits include turning “Jaws” into a grindhouse movie, transforming “Scream” to resemble the Italian horror genre known as giallo, reworking “Lord of the Rings” to follow a serialized structure more akin to the books and creating a mashup of director Darren Aronofsky’s films “The Wrestler” and “Black Swan.” 

Wille has firsthand knowledge of fan edits. In a project titled “Watchmen: Midnight,” he reworked the 2009 film “Watchmen” to more closely resemble the narrative structure, characterizations and spirit of the 1980s comic book series.

“There is a misconception that a fan edit is about fixing something that is broken, but a lot of fan edits are not about that at all,” Wille said. “It’s about exploring a particular character arc, trying to transform a film from one genre to another, or just reinterpreting cinema in new ways.”

In the case of “The Phantom Edit,” many of the revisions were intended to speed up the pace of the movie.

“Mike J. Nichols justifies a lot of what he did in the film on the principles of good story telling,” Wille said. “To keep the momentum in the film, he enters a scene late and leaves it early, so you are always catching the most crucial information.”

Since the release of “The Phantom Edit,” fan editors have formed online communities and reinterpreted hundreds of other films. For Wille, fan edits are similar to the practice of remixing songs. And they aren’t all that different from recent directors who have released alternative versions to classic films, such as Lucas’ revision of the early “Star Wars” films, Francis Ford Coppola’s release of “Apocalypse Now: Redux” and Steven Spielberg’s updated “E.T.”

“Fan edits join these other alternative forms that communicate to a wider audience that a film is malleable, and not a fixed artifact like a statute,” Wille said. “Fan edits may be somewhat of a underground artistic movement, but I think they are on the cusp of being something more widely understood and accepted.”



KU in the news
The Huffington Post Tue, 06/28/2016
The Christian Science MonitorThu, 06/23/2016
Two chemical engineering students earn Goldwater Scholarships. https://t.co/7cDPEcNQCs Rock Chalk! #BeAJayhawk https://t.co/77e1CBNi6N


One of 34 U.S. public institutions in the prestigious Association of American Universities
26 prestigious Rhodes Scholars — more than all other Kansas colleges combined
Nearly $290 million in financial aid annually
44 nationally ranked graduate programs.
—U.S. News & World Report
Top 50 nationwide for size of library collection.
—ALA
23rd nationwide for service to veterans —"Best for Vets," Military Times
KU Today